Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets

The effect of 5 different surface conditioning methods on bonding of metal brackets to cast dental alloys was examined. The surface conditioning methods were fine (30-µm) or rough (125-µm) diamond bur, sandblasting (50-µm or 110-µm aluminum oxide [Al2O3]), and silica coating (30-µm silica). Fifty disc-shaped specimens of 5 different alloys (gold-silver, palladium-silver, nickel-chromium, cobaltchromium, and titanium) were ground with 1200-grit silicone carbide abrasive and polished before being reused for each conditioning method. Polished surfaces were used as negative controls. After measuring surface roughness (RZ), metal brackets were bonded to the conditioned alloys with a self-curing resin composite. Specimens were thermocycled (5000 times, 5°–55°C, 30 seconds), and shear bond tests were performed. Significantly higher (P .001) surface roughnesses were observed with use of the rough diamond bur (RZ ~33 µm), 110-µm Al2 O3 (RZ ~14 µm), and fine diamond bur (RZ ~10 µm), compared with the controls (RZ ~1 µm). Silica coating (RZ ~4 µm) and 50-µm Al2 O3 (RZ ~4 µm) demonstrated no significant difference (P > .001) in roughness when compared with the controls. The control group showed no resistance to shear forces (0 MPa). Bond values were greater (19 MPa) when silica coating was used, compared with 50-µm Al2O3 (7 MPa) and 110-µm Al2O3 (8 MPa) for all alloys tested. However, interaction between alloys and conditioning methods exhibited significant differences (P > .0001)

Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces

With the increase in adult orthodontic treatment comes the need to find a reliable method for bonding orthodontic brackets onto metal or ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. In this study, shear bond strength and surface roughness tests were used to examine the effect of 4 different surface conditioning methods: fine diamond bur, sandblasting, 5% hydrofluoric acid, and silica coating for bonding metal brackets to ceramic surfaces of feldspathic porcelain. Sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid were further tested after silane application. A total of 120 ceramic disc samples were produced, and 50 were used for surface roughness measurements. The glazed ceramic surfaces were used as controls. Metal brackets were bonded to the ceramic substrates with a self-curing composite. The samples were stored in 0.9% NaCl solution for 24 hours and then thermocycled (5000 times, 5degreesC to 55degreesC, 30 seconds). Shear bond tests were performed with a universal testing device, and the results were statistically analyzed. Chemical surface conditioning with either hydrofluoric acid (4.3 mum) or silicatization (4.4 mum) resulted in significantly lower surface roughness than mechanical conditioning (9.3 mum, diamond bur; 9.7 mum, sandblasting) (P <.001). The surface roughness values reflect the mean peak-and-valley distances. The bond strengths of the brackets bonded to the ceramic surfaces treated by hydrofluoric acid with and without silane (12.2 and 14.7 MPa, respectively), silicatization (14.9 MPa), and sandblasting with silane (15.8 MPa) were significantly higher (P <.001) than those treated by mechanical roughening with fine diamond burs (1.6 MPa) or sandblasting (2.8 MPa). The highest bond strength values were obtained with sandblasting and silicatization with silane or hydrofluoric acid without silane; these fulfilled the required threshold. The use of silane after hydrofluoric acid etching did not increase the bond strength. Diamond roughening and sandblasting showed the highest surface roughness; they can damage the ceramic surface. Acid etching gave acceptable results for clinical use, but the health risks should be considered. The silicatization technique has the potential to replace the other methods; yet cohesive failures were observed in the ceramic during removal of the brackets

The fit of tapered posts in root canals luted with zinc phosphate cement:A histological study

Objectives. Stress transmission to the root through passive fitting dental posts is partly influenced by the thickness of the cement layer between the post and the prepared root canal surface as well as the fit of the post in the root canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cement gap between the post surfaces and the root canals using five prefabricated, tapered, unthreaded titanium posts of different manufacturers, without and with cement. Methods. Following the endodontic treatment with hand instruments of 100 intact anterior teeth, post spaces were prepared using opening drills of the corresponding size of post. Fifty posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement into the roots for each system while another 50 posts were inserted into the canal without using the cement. After histological sectioning, the cement gap was measured at six sites for three times at the coronal, middle and apical regions between the root canal wall and the post surface under a light microscope before and after cementation. Results. Before cementation, the highest overall cement gap was observed with the Dr Mooser post system (R) (46 mu m) and the lowest with the Velva post system (R) and Cylindro-Conical system (R) (30 mu m). Significantly less (P <0.05) mean cement gap was observed with respect to the Erlangen post system (R) (41 mu m), the Dr Mooser post system (R) (48 mu m), the MP Pirec post system (R) (34 mu m) and Velva post system (R) (33 pm) when compared with the Cylindro-Conical system (R) (62 tm). The Cylindro-Conical system (R) (79, 61 gm) and MP Pirec post system (R) (25, 24 tm) demonstrated no significant difference (P > 0.001) compared with Velva-Post (R) (38, 20 mu m) at the coronal and middle part, respectively (Mann-Whitney U-test, Boneferroni correction). Significant differences (P <0.001) were observed between the cement gap at the coronal and apical part for the Cylindro-Conical system (R) (79, 46 mu m), Dr Mooser post system (R) (45, 56 mu m) and MP Pirec post system (R) (25, 52 mu m). After cementation, the highest cement gap at the coronal part was obtained with the Cylindro-Conical system (R) (79 +/- 21 mu m) and the lowest with the MP Pirec post system (R) (25 +/- 9 mu m). However, at the apical end, the MP Pirec post system (R) (52 +/- 89 gm) and Dr Mooser post system (R) (56 +/- 16 gm) revealed the highest gap. Significance. Form-congruence between the preparation drill and the post systems exhibited differences. The most consistent cement gap either at the coronal, middle or apical parts of the root canals was obtained with the Erlangen post system (R). (c) 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserve